Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148048

Table 2. Data quality evaluation of sample.

Sample name Raw reads Clean reads GC (%) Error (%) Q20 (%) Total mapped
DW4 14828646 14638472 46.28 0.04 96.54 13339188(91.12%)
FW4_1 11124834 10985291 46.31 0.04 96.64 9970094 (90.76%)
FW4_2 13629475 13435056 46.55 0.04 96.55 12162626(90.53%)
DW12 14950551 14780536 45.72 0.04 96.87 13469925(91.13%)
FW12_1 14905611 14714091 46.11 0.04 96.84 13383604(90.96%)
FW12_2 10853023 10724071 46.13 0.04 96.58 9603058 (89.55%)
DW24 15461231 15289907 46.51 0.04 96.68 13912721(90.99%)
FW24_1 15748199 15529280 46.45 0.04 96.72 13832709(89.08%)
FW24_2 12921595 12747599 46.01 0.04 96.60 11423440(89.61%)
DW48 11949074 11785699 46.70 0.04 96.54 10655203(90.41%)
FW48_1 11187930 11038671 46.63 0.04 96.58 10023240(90.80%)
FW48_2 15715268 15512388 46.16 0.04 96.63 14021279(90.39%)