Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148208

Fig 10. Attention span is not explained by inhibition of return.

Fig 10

(A) Neither in CantonS nor in rsh1 (N = 21 and N = 35) a correlation is found between chain length on one side and subsequent number of responses to the other side (and no responses). (B) After a chain of responses to one side, the number of displacements it takes the fly to return with its response polarity to that side, does not depend upon duration of ITIs. Error bars are SEMs (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).