Table 2.
Independent variables* | Co-efficient (β) | Excess risk, Exp(β)-1 | t-statistic | Statistical significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
STD | 1.57 | 3.79 | 2.59 | < 0.01 |
RP | 0.78 | 1.19 | 1.26 | n.s. |
Log baseline costs of consequences | 0.40 | 0.50 | 4.76 | <0.0001 |
Log baseline costs of consequences x STD | −0.23 | −0.21 | −2.18 | <0.05 |
Log baseline costs of consequences x RP | −0.13 | −0.12 | −1.18 | n.s. |
Notation: STD denotes standard continuing care program; RP denotes relapse prevention program, TEL denotes telephone-based continuing care program (reference). n.s. denotes not statistically significant, log denotes natural logarithm. Regressions were run with SAS procedure PROC MIXED.
Earlier models tested the following independent variables, but dropped them from the final model because they proved to be not statistically significant: Treatment condition x Log baseline cost of consequences, Log income, Log baseline income, Treatment condition x Log baseline income, Baseline investment, Treatment condition x Log baseline investment, Program, Treatment condition, and Sequence