Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Dec 12;159:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.034

Table 2.

Regression results for costs of consequences (log scale, with TEL as reference)

Independent variables* Co-efficient (β) Excess risk, Exp(β)-1 t-statistic Statistical significance
STD 1.57 3.79 2.59 < 0.01
RP 0.78 1.19 1.26 n.s.
Log baseline costs of consequences 0.40 0.50 4.76 <0.0001
Log baseline costs of consequences x STD −0.23 −0.21 −2.18 <0.05
Log baseline costs of consequences x RP −0.13 −0.12 −1.18 n.s.

Notation: STD denotes standard continuing care program; RP denotes relapse prevention program, TEL denotes telephone-based continuing care program (reference). n.s. denotes not statistically significant, log denotes natural logarithm. Regressions were run with SAS procedure PROC MIXED.

*

Earlier models tested the following independent variables, but dropped them from the final model because they proved to be not statistically significant: Treatment condition x Log baseline cost of consequences, Log income, Log baseline income, Treatment condition x Log baseline income, Baseline investment, Treatment condition x Log baseline investment, Program, Treatment condition, and Sequence