Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 23;31(6):610–618. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2647

Table 3.

Pharmacodynamic outcomes for secondary endpoint INS–AUC0–1 h and INS–Cmax

Parameter Lixisenatide treatment group Effect estimate vs placebo 90% confidence intervals p‐value
INS–AUC0–1 h (pmol min L−1) 2.5 µg −8648 −12,713, −4584 <0.001
5 µg −16,762 −20,848, −12,676 <0.001
10 µg −21,896 −25,936, −17,856 <0.001
20 µg −24,848 −29,078, −20,618 <0.001
INS–Cmax
(pmol L−1)
2.5 µg −101 −216, 15 NS
5 µg −277 −391, −164 <0.001
10 µg −428 −543, −314 <0.001
20 µg −388 −509, −268 <0.001
Parameter Lixisenatide treatment group Effect estimate between doses 90% confidence intervals p‐value
INS–AUC0–1 h (pmol min L−1) 5 µg vs 2.5 µg −8114 −12,173, −4055 0.001
10 µg vs 2.5 µg −13,248 −17,214, −9281 <0.001
20 µg vs 2.5 µg −16,200 −20,262, −12,137 <0.001
10 µg vs 5 µg −5134 −9170, −1098 0.038
20 µg vs 5 µg −8086 −12,322, −3850 0.002
20 µg vs 10 µg −2952 −7049, 1145 NS
INS–Cmax (pmol L−1) 5 µg vs 2.5 µg −177 −289, −64 0.011
10 µg vs 2.5 µg −328 −440, −216 <0.001
20 µg vs 2.5 µg −288 −403, −173 <0.001
10 µg vs 5 µg −151 −263, −40 0.027
20 µg vs 5 µg −111 −229, 6 NS
20 µg vs 10 µg 40 −76, 156 NS

AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum concentration; INS, insulin; NS, non‐significant p‐value.

Data are point estimates of treatment group differences with 90% confidence intervals for lixisenatide treatment groups (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg) versus placebo or between lixisenatide doses.