Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1518–1526. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001276

Table 3.

Variability in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy use (compared to BCS) explained by patient, disease and area characteristics

Characteristic % of variation explained
Young age 32
Breast reconstruction 29
Stage 0 (DCIS) 5
Lobular histology 4
Race 4
Tumor size 4
Facility location 3

Percent of variation explained by each characteristic based on change in logistic regression pseudo-R2, with and without each characteristic. Only variables that changed the pseudo R2 by ≥2% are shown here. The full model included all characteristics shown in Table 3, and had a pseudo R2 of 0.1274, c-statistic 0.75, n=1,149,395.