Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 8;6(3):e00428. doi: 10.1002/brb3.428

Table 1.

Results summary

Financial Internal researcher review cost $21/scan
70% of cost supports radiologist labor
IRB members/researchers lack consensus re: reasonable costs
  • Range $0 to $1500

  • 85% of researchers suggest reasonable cost is >$25

Health literacy Discrepant assumptions (P < 0.0001)
  • IRB members/researchers estimate that participants have low literacy

  • Research participants self‐estimate high literacy

Anxiety Discrepant assumptions (P < 0.001)
  • IRB members/researchers estimate that research participants experience high anxiety from receiving a personal MRI report

  • Research participants report low anxiety when actually receiving their own research radiology report

Return of results 87% of research participants want to be informed about all scan findings, regardless of clinical significance
91% of research participants consider having their scans reviewed and findings reported to them a benefit to study participation
Incidental findings rates 14% of all scans recommended further clinical evaluation
  • Binary categorization of IF into those needing or not needing further evaluation

In outcomes study, 63% of participants followed up with a doctor as recommended in their MRI report
37% of participants did not follow‐up as recommended
  • 14% already knew of the IF

  • 29% cited financial reasons for not seeing a doctor

  • 43% decided not to follow‐up after discussing IF with the institution's Medical Director

Clinical follow‐up 38% of participants who followed‐up with a physician after receiving an IF report required further diagnostic studies
  • None regretted receiving their IF report

  • 2 were concerned re: high personal cost of additional testing

IRB, Institutional Review Board; IF, Incidental findings; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging.