Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;102(10):1229–1239. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9852

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for the three trials

AJAX (n = 116) ECAR (n = 107) IMPROVE (n = 613)
Randomized group
EVAR/EVAR strategy 57 (49·1) 56 (52·3) 316 (51·5)
Open repair 59 (50·9) 51 (47·7) 297 (48·5)
rAAA suitable for EVAR n = 113 n = 104 n = 310
EVAR/EVAR strategy 57 (50·4) 54 (51·9) 168 (54·2)
Open repair 56 (49·6) 50 (48·1) 142 (45·8)
Procedure commenced
EVAR 57 (49·1) 56 (52·3) 192 (31·3)
Open repair 59 (50·9) 50 (46·7) 331 (54·0)
No aneurysm repair 0 (0) 1 (0·9) 90 (14·7)
Age (years)* 74·2(9·4) 74·4(10·6) 76·7(7·6)
Sex ratio (M : F) 99 : 17 97 : 10 480 : 133
Admission mean arterial BP (mmHg)*, § n = 113 n = 104 n = 601
87(27) 108(30) 81(24)
Hardman index n = 61 n = 105 n = 539
0 26 (43) 41 (39·0) 164 (30·4)
1 19 (31) 44 (41·9) 254 (47·1)
2 12 (20) 11 (10·5) 94 (17·4)
≥ 3 4 (7) 9 (8·6) 27 (5·0)
Morphology
Maximum aortic diameter (mm)* n = 92
76(16)
n = 106
77(20)
n = 518
84(19)
Aneurysm neck diameter (mm)*, n = 92
26(4)
n = 106
24(4)
n = 430
26(4)
Neck length (mm) n = 92
25 (19–34)
n = 101
21 (15–30)
n = 481
22 (10–34)
Proximal neck angle (°)* n = 92
39(21)
n = 96
34(26)
n = 478
33(20)

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise;

*

values are mean(s.d.) and

median (i.q.r.).

Suitability for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in IMPROVE defined by local assessment of suitability if available; otherwise a core laboratory assessment of ‘within liberal instructions for use’ was used to define suitability. Suitability not assessed in 46 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) in IMPROVE and one in ECAR.

§

Mean arterial BP recorded only in ECAR; for AJAX and IMPROVE it was approximated by 2/3 diastolic + 1/3 systolic BP.

IMPROVE and ECAR measured top neck diameter; AJAX measured maximum neck diameter.