Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 2;6(30):28755–28773. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4810

Table 2. SPI values of different classification systems on the nonsmoker and KRAS datasets.

Feature set (#DEGs/DETs/DEEs) Non-smoker
(24 samples)
KRAS
(16 samples)
DESeq DEGs (13) 1.000 0.996
Cuffdiff DEGs (14) 1.000 0.991
Cuffdiff DETs (50) 0.995 0.948*
DEXseq DEEs (397) 0.998 0.919*
DEXseq DEEs – Naïve FPKM (28) 0.930 1.000
*

In the KRAS dataset, the DET- and DEE-based systems each made an error by assigning a tumor sample to the “normal” group, even though the SPI values were fairly high. All other predictions in this table reached 100% accuracy.