Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 18;6(30):29311–29323. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4906

Table 1. Characteristics of the 32 studies included in the meta-analysis.

First author, year Country Period Histology Detection method Cutoff value for detection No. of subjects (LMP1+/LMP1−) Median/mean age (range) Median/mean follow-up time (months) Quality score HR (95% CI) for overall survival
NPC
Chen, 2010 China 1992–2002 NPC IHC IRS, ≥4 224 (141/83) 46 (14–86) NA 8 2.06 (1.16–3.64)
Hariwiyanto, 2010 Indonesia NA NPC IHC H-score, >7 56 (27/29) (11–70)* NA 7 5.56 (1.87–16.50)
Kitagawa, 2013 Japan 1998–2009 NPC IHC Percentage, ≥10% 74 (35/39) Median >50 45.24 7 1.26 (0.69–2.28)
Li, 2009 China 1999–2003 NPC IHC Percentage × staining intensity, ≥1 57 (24/33) 56.2 (22–72) 36 8 2.73 (0.91–8.17)
Sarac, 2001 Turkey 1979–1993 Un differentiated NPC IHC Positive: detectable 35 (10/25) 35 (5–71) 66 7 2.82 (0.88–8.98)
Song, 2007 China 2001–2003 NPC IHC Percentage, ≥10% 50 (25/25) 50.24* NA 8 4.72 (1.45–15.33)
Wang, 2008 China 1999–2003 Nonkeratin NPC IHC Percentage, ≥25% 60 (24/36) 53 (18–79) 36–74 8 3.17 (1.37–7.31)
Zhu, 2004 China 1990–1991 Un differentiated NPC IHC Percentage × staining intensity, ≥1 60 (39/21) 38 (13–65) 56 8 2.80 (1.30–6.04)
NHL
Cao, 2008 China 1994–2000 ENKL IHC Percentage, ≥ 10% 58 (47/11) 45.4 (10–78) 84 7 2.59 (1.01–6.67)
Hirose, 2006 Japan 1980–2004 PTCL IHC NA 43 (14/29) 63 (17–86) 14 6 1.68 (0.80–3.54)
Ishii, 2007 Japan 1990–2003 ENKL PCR >40 copies/ml 20 (13/7) 52.5 (28–71) 34 7 7.02 (1.91–25.73)
Kanemitsu, 2012 Japan 1996–2010 ENKL IHC NA 30 (22/8) 62 (27–85) 26.7 6 0.24 (0.07–0.80)
Kuze, 1996 Japan 1983–1995 BCL IHC NA 17 (6/11) 60 (35–82) 12 5 0.85 (0.19–3.82)
Paydas, 2008 Turkey NA NHL IHC NA 138 (20/118) 51.6 (16–82) NA 5 3.49 (1.68–7.25)
Xu, 2009 China 1995–2005 ENKL IHC Percentage × staining intensity, ≥1 62 (30/32) 41 (13–79) NA 7 1.73 (0.86–3.46)
Yamamoto,1999 Japan 1974–1994 TCL ISH mRNA positive in tumor cells 25 (15/10) NA >36 7 3.80 (0.92–15.80)
Zhao, 2005 China 2000–2004 ENKL IHC Positive: detectable 36 (6/30) 40 (16–71) 17.7 7 1.28 (0.40–4.02)
HD
Clarke, 2001 USA 1988–1994 HL IHC NA 78 (51/27) (45–79)* 73 6 3.00 (1.50–6.40)
Claviez, 2005 Germany & Austria 1990–2001 HL IHC NA 842 (263/579) 13.7 (2.2–20.2) 58.5 7 3.00 (1.22–7.39)
Dinand, 2009 India 1991–2004 cHL IHC Percentage, ≥25% 122 (113/9) 8 (2–14) 48 7 0.60 (0.10–4.90)
Enblad, 1999 Sweden 1985–1988 HL IHC NA 117 (32/85) 45 (11–87) 130 7 2.06 (0.71–6.00)
Engel, 2000 South Africa NA HL IHC NA 36 (24/12) 8 (3–14) 4–150 7 0.08 (0.02–0.45)
Glavina-Durdov, 2001 Croatia 1980–1990 HL IHC NA 100 (26/74) 40 (13–84) NA 7 0.98 (0.42–2.32)
Herling, 2003 USA& Italy & Greece 1984–2000 cHL IHC Positive: detectable 303 (61/242) 30* 65 7 1.11 (0.50–2.45)
Keresztes, 2005 Hungary NA HL IHC NA 109 (47/62) 31 (3–74) 83 6 2.13 (0.74–6.15)
Krugmann, 2003 Austria 1974–1999 cHL IHC NA 119 (31/88) 37.6 (14–83) 122 7 0.96 (0.39–2.33)
Morente, 1997 Spain NA HL IHC Positive: detectable 140 (72/68) 37.2 (5–83) 65 8 0.39 (0.17–0.92)
Murray, 1999 UK 1992–1996 HL IHC NA 161 (41/120) 33 (22–49) 86 6 0.71 (0.32–1.57)
Naresh, 2000 India 1984–1988 cHL IHC Percentage, ≥10% 110 (86/24) 22 (4–61) 57 6 0.26 (0.08–0.88)
Quijano, 2004 Colombia 1994–1998 HL IHC NA 57 (32/25) (3–83)* 23.8 6 0.36 (0.08 -1.60)
Stark, 2002 UK 1991–1998 HL IHC NA 70 (24/46) (60–91)* 62.5 8 3.12 (1.36–7.11)
GC
Lee, 2004 Korea 1995–1996 GC IHC Percentage, ≥10% 343 (63/280) 55* 54 6 0.70 (0.44–1.13)

Abbreviations: cHL, classical Hodgkin lymphoma; CI, confidence interval; ENKL, extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type; GC, gastric cancer; HD, Hodgkin disease; HR, hazard ratio; H-score, histochemistry score; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IRS, immunoreactive score; ISH, in situ hybridization; LMP1, latent membrane protein 1; NA, not available; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphomas; TCL, T-cell lymphoma.

*

Median/mean age or range is not available.

The survival data was only available for patients aged older than 45 years.

The positive/negative cases in these studies were positive/negative for Epstein-Barr virus encoded nuclear RNA-1 (EBER-1) as detected by in situ hybridization. The positive rates of LMP1 detected by IHC were 69%, 90%, 65%, and 93% in the EBER-1 positive cases in the studies by Clarke, Engel, Naresh, and Lee, respectively.