Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr. 2013 Jan 30;143(4):486–492. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.169987

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of supplement users and nonusers among pregnant women in NHANES 1999–2006

Supplement users, n = 1007 Supplement nonusers, n = 289 Chi-square P value

n weighted % 1 n weighted %
All pregnant women 1007 77.6 ± 2.2 289 22.4 ± 2.2 <0.0001
Age
    <25 y 364 28.3 ± 2.7 181 56.7 ± 5.3 <0.0001
    ≥25 y 643 71.7 ± 2.7 108 43.2 ± 5.3
Race/ethnicity
    Non-Hispanic white 508 62.5 ± 2.7 54 27.7 ± 5.7 <0.0001
    Non-Hispanic black 129 12.3 ± 1.5 78 27.0 ± 4.6
    Mexican-American 266 11.7 ± 1.4 125 23.6 ± 3.7
    Other 104 13.5 ± 2.3 32 21.7 ± 6.4
Marital status
    Unmarried 201 17.9 ± 2.5 126 46.5 ± 5.2 <0.0001
    Married 772 76.0 ± 2.9 153 45.3 ± 4.7
    Missing3 34 10
Parity
    First birth 297 29.5 ± 2.7 58 17.0 ± 4.1 NS4
    Second birth or higher 635 63.2 ± 3.3 193 69.5 ± 5.6
    Missing 75 38
Trimester
    First 141 16.3 ± 2.2 97 44.4 ± 6.1 <0.01
    Second 372 34.7 ± 3.2 86 40.8 ± 5.3
    Third 370 32.9 ± 3.1 50 14.8 ± 3.7
    Missing 124 16.1 ± 2.6 56 25.7 ± 4.4
Health insurance
    No 130 9.4 ± 1.4 110 34.8 ± 4.3 <0.0001
    Yes 875 90.5 ± 1.4 173 63.8 ± 4.5
    Missing 2 2 6 2
Poverty-income ratio
    <1 286 15.2 ± 1.6 142 41.4 ± 6.7 <0.0001
    1–1.9 202 16.5 ± 2.4 76 21.2 ± 4.9
    ≥2 519 59.4 ± 3.4 71 29.1 ± 5.9
    Missing 70 25
Education
    High school or less 480 33.9 ± 2.9 231 75.5 ± 4.5 <0.0001
    Some college or more 526 66.0 ± 2.9 58 24.5 ± 4.5
    Missing 1 0
1

Values are percentage ± SE based on weighted data.

2

Denote unreliable estimates.

3

Missing denotes women who were missing data for the variable of interest.

4

P value ≥ 0.05.