Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2015 Dec 8;43(6):1112–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.005

Figure 3. Characterization of WT and Klrc1−/− CD8+ T cell and NK cell responses to ECTV.

Figure 3

Mice were infected with ECTV and spleens analyzed for CD8+ T cell responses 7 d.p.i. (A) CD3+CD8+B8R-H2-Kb+ T cell numbers were quantified from spleens. (B) WT or Klrc1−/− splenocytes were pulsed ex vivo with irrelevant SIINFEKL peptide or poxvirus-specific B8R20-27, then assessed for CD107a and IFN-γ expression by intracellular staining of CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes. The frequency of CD107a+IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells and MFI of IFN-γ+ cells were quantified from WT (black bars) and Klrc1−/− splenocytes (white bars). (C) Splenocytes were incubated overnight with irrelevant or B8R20-27 peptides to restimulate CD8+ T cells. IFN-γ accumulation in the supernatant was quantified by bead array. (D) IFN-γ concentration was measured from the sera of ECTV-infected mice by bead array. (E) Splenocytes were treated as in panel A, then assessed for GM-CSF intracellular content. GM-CSF+ cell frequency and MFI of GM-CSF+ cells are shown. (F) Splenocytes were treated as in panel C. GM-CSF accumulation in the supernatant was quantified by ELISA. (G) Splenocytes were treated as in panel A, and TNF or IL-2 intracellular content was determined. (H) CD3+CD8+ lymphocyte blasting was assessed by FSC and SSC. (I) Total CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes were analyzed for KLRG1 and CD127 expression. Frequency of SLEC (KLRG1+CD127) and MPEC (KLRG1CD127+) populations are shown. (J) Expression of IFN-γ and CD107a in splenic NK cells were measured 5.5 d.p.i. Splenocytes were incubated with or without 1×105 YAC-1 targets cells, then stained for NK cell markers and intracellular IFN-γ. Dot plots show CD107a and IFN-γ expression on CD3NK1.1+ NK cells. (K) Viral load in popliteal lymph nodes was assessed by plaque assay 3 days p.i. All data are pooled from at least 2 independent experiments and were analyzed by multiple t tests. Further supporting evidence can be found in Supplemental Figure 3.