TABLE 3.
Post-intervention | Six-month follow-up | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EES (n=25) |
PFR (n=18) |
EES (n=25) |
PFR (n=18) |
|||||||
Adj M (SD) | Adj M (SD) | F | p | d | Adj M (SD) | Adj M (SD) | F | p | d | |
Parent Report Outcomes | ||||||||||
RAB Understanding Toddlers |
51.57 (3.58) | 51.22 (4.84) | 0.06 | .814 | −.10 | 51.18 (5.09) | 52.02 (4.95) | 0.29 | .594 | 0.22 |
PSI Difficult child | 8.67 (3.95) | 9.36 (4.84) | 0.16 | .691 | −.16 | 9.95 (4.16) | 7.96 (5.79) | 1.29 | .263 | 0.44 |
PSI Parent-child dysfunction |
3.96 (3.90) | 5.70 (4.11) | 1.28 | .265 | −.46 | 4.47 (4.51) | 4.96 (5.32) | 0.12 | .731 | −0.13 |
Observed Parent Outcomes | ||||||||||
NCATS Parent sensitivity | 11.46 (4.52) | 12.58 (4.88) | 0.55 | .464 | .30 | 13.27 (3.92) | 14.64 (2.99) | 1.37 | .249 | 0.45 |
IPCI Parent support | 2.04 (0.36) | 2.05 (0.34) | 0.01 | .934 | .03 | 2.05 (0.40) | 2.36 (0.40) | 5.14 | .029 | 0.87 |
Parent Report Child Outcomes | ||||||||||
BITSEA Competence | 16.77 (2.87) | 17.72 (2.74) | 0.94 | .339 | .41 | 18.05 (2.24) | 18.52 (2.82) | 0.32 | .573 | 0.22 |
BITSEA Problem behavior | 9.23 (4.46) | 10.29 (6.54) | 0.37 | .549 | −.26 | 10.59 (5.89) | 7.75 (5.21) | 2.07 | .159 | 0.57 |
CBCL Internalizing | 6.92 (5.16) | 6.50 (3.61) | 0.05 | .818 | 0.09 | |||||
CBCL Externalizing | 15.54 (7.53) | 11.48 (7.65) | 2.06 | .159 | 0.55 | |||||
Observed Child Outcomes | ||||||||||
BRS Emotional regulation | 3.92 (0.65) | 4.19 (0.75) | 1.30 | .261 | 0.44 | |||||
BRS Exploration | 4.39 (0.58) | 4.42(0.47) | 0.02 | .884 | 0.06 | |||||
TAS45 Secure base behavior |
0.15 (0.06) | 0.13 (0.06) | 0.59 | .446 | −.31 | 0.12 (0.07) | 0.14 (0.10) | 0.39 | .537 | 0.23 |
IPCI Engagement with parent |
2.14 (0.52) | 2.01 (0.49) | 0.42 | .52 | −.26 | 2.32 (0.53) | 2.45 (0.38) | 1.50 | .228 | 0.29 |
Notes: Adj M = mean adjusted for ANCOVA model covariates, SD = standard deviation, d = effect size (difference in adjusted mean/square root of mean square error) with a positive effect size indicating the difference favors the PFR condition. ANCOVA models adjust for baseline score, age of child, whether multiple removals, and time between baseline and the given follow-up assessment.