Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 2;16(1):e47–e53. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.01.009

Table 2:

Comparison of variables among elderly Malaysian subjects undergoing a combined dance and relaxation intervention (n = 44) as compared to controls (n = 40) undergoing relaxation exercises alone (N = 84)

Variable Mean ± SD P value Partial η2*
Baseline Week 3 Week 6
Cognitive impairment <0.001 0.42
IG 23.7 ± 3.4 25.0 ± 3.3 26.6 ± 3.0
CG 22.6 ± 3.2 22.5 ± 3.2 21.2 ± 3.7
Anxiety <0.001 0.26
IG 7.5 ± 3.5 6.1 ± 3.6 4.4 ± 2.7
CG 6.2 ± 3.7 7.1 ± 3.3 7.6 ± 3.1
Depression <0.001 0.35
IG 7.6 ± 3.1 5.3 ± 3.0 3.7 ± 2.7
CG 7.1 ± 3.1 8.1 ± 3.3 8.4 ± 3.4
QOL§ <0.001 0.29
IG 32.0 ± 7.0 34.1 ± 5.1 36.4 ± 4.1
CG 31.6 ± 4.8 30.2 ± 4.6 28.8 ± 4.4

SD = standard deviation; IG = intervention group; CG = control group; QOL = quality of life.

*

Partial η2 was used to measure the effect size as either small (0.01 ≤η2 <0.06), medium (0.06 ≤η2 <0.14) or large (η2 ≥0.14).22

Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination with scores of 21–28 and 10–20 out of 30 indicating mild and moderate cognitive impairment, respectively.14

Anxiety and depression were self-assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with scores of <7, 8–10 and ≥11 out of 21 considered normal, borderline abnormal and abnormal, respectively.17,18

§

QOL was self-assessed by subjects using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease questionnaire with scores of <33 and >34 out of 52 indicating low and high QOL, respectively.19,20