Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 27;474(3):816–824. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4613-2

Table 2.

Comparison of pixel value ratios between the two techniques

Cortex Pixel value ratio p value
Lengthening over nail (n = 62 tibiae) Lengthening and then nailing (n = 178 tibiae)
Anterior
 4 weeks 0.78 ± 0.06 0.74 ± 0.05 0.605
 8 weeks 0.75 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.04 0.525
 12 weeks 0.72 ± 0.05 0.76 ± 0.03 0.326
Posterior
 4 weeks 0.82 ± 0.08 0.76 ± 0.05 0.607
 8 weeks 0.78 ± 0.05 0.89 ± 0.04 < 0.001
 12 weeks 0.75 ± 0.07 0.89 ± 0.03 < 0.001
Medial
 4 weeks 0.75 ± 0.06 0.72 ± 0.05 0.543
 8 weeks 0.73 ± 0.05 0.82 ± 0.05 < 0.001
 12 weeks 0.71 ± 0.05 0.82 ± 0.03 < 0.001
Lateral
 4 weeks 0.85 ± 0.06 0.82 ± 0.06 0.814
 8 weeks 0.78 ± 0.06 0.88 ± 0.03 < 0.001
 12 weeks 0.78 ± 0.06 0.91 ± 0.03 < 0.001

Pixel value ratio = the ratio of pixel value of the regenerate bone versus the mean pixel value of the proximal and distal adjacent bones of the lengthened area on radiographs (values are mean ± SD).