Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 27;474(3):816–824. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4613-2

Table 3.

Comparison of callus shapes between the two techniques

Callus shape Number of tibia p value
Lengthening over nail (n = 62 tibiae) Lengthening and then nailing (n = 178 tibiae)
Fusiform 4 (6%) 61 (34%) < 0.001
Cylindrical 50 (81%) 117 (66%) < 0.001
Concave 8 (13%) 0 (0%) < 0.001
Lateral 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.999
Central 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.999

Callus shape was based on the classification by Li et al. [22].