Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;40:629–635. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3257-4

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes of this study

Single trunk RLN, no (%)
Bifid RLN left
Bifid RLN right
Bifid RLN bilateral
1887 (75.5)
290 (23.2)
323 (25.8)
92 (7.4)
Bifid RLN, no (%)
Posterior sensory branch (no EMG, no laryngeal twitch)
Posterior motor branch (positive EMG and laryngeal twitch)
Posterior motor branch (no EMG but palpable laryngeal twitch)
613 (24.5)
605 (98.7)
4 (0.6)
4 (0.6)
Distance from RLN ramification point into the larynx entry, mm (95 % CI)
 Posterior sensory branch 19 (17–21)
 Posterior motor branch 9 (7–11)
RLN EMG amplitude following 1 mA stimulation of the anterior brancha, mean ± SD
 Posterior sensory branch (no EMG, no laryngeal twitch) 948 ± 199 µV
 Posterior motor branch (positive EMG and laryngeal twitch) 785 ± 158 µV
 Posterior motor branch (no EMG but palpable laryngeal twitch) 1534 ± 150 µV
RLN EMG amplitude following 1 mA stimulation of the posterior branch, mean ± SD
 Posterior motor branch (positive EMG and laryngeal twitch) 474 ± 76 µV
 Posterior motor branch (no EMG but palpable laryngeal twitch) No EMG
Early RLN injury, no (%)
Single trunk RLN
Bifid RLN
62 (2.5)
30 (1.6)
32 (5.2)
Permanent RLN injury, no (%)
Single trunk RLN
Bifid RLN
10 (0.4)
3 (0.2)
7 (1.1)

RLN recurrent laryngeal nerve, EMG electromyography

p = 0.001

p < 0.001

aResponse from the anterior branch following stimulation with 1.0 mA