Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 26;2016:8247014. doi: 10.1155/2016/8247014

Table 3.

Alteration in the response time in mice treated with Oroxylum indicum before subjecting them to tail immersion test.

Treatment Dose (mg/kg b.wt.) Response time in seconds ± SEM
Assessment time (h)
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Control 0 4.30 ± 0.05 4.2 ± 0.20 4.03 ± 0.12 4.6 ± 0.35 4.81 ± 0.51 4.62 ± 0.42 4.31 ± 0.37 4.30 ± 0.40

OIE 300 5.67 ± 0.20 6.33 ± 0.15 6.78 ± 0.51 8.80 ± 0.06 7.56 ± 0.05 6.98 ± 0.15 6.80 ± 0.20 6.61 ± 0.27
(11.64) (19.57) (55.20) (33.33) (23.10) (19.92) (16.57)
250 4.69 ± 0.50 4.72 ± 0.08 4.97 ± 0.30 4.78 ± 0.46 7.14 ± 0.54 5.65 ± 0.65 4.90 ± 0.15 4.80 ± 0.10
(1.91) (5.97) (19.18) (52.23) (20.46) (4.47) (2.35)

Diclofenac 20 4.29 ± 0.08 4.43 ± 0.20 5.03 ± 0.11 6.76 ± 0.5 7.31 ± 0.57 6.87 ± 0.48 6.39 ± 0.47 4.50 ± 0.70
(3.26) (17.29) (57.57) (70.39) (60.13) (48.95) (4.89)

Inhibition (%) is shown in brackets.

N = 10.

P < 0.05 when compared to SPS treated control.