Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0166-3

Table 3.

Odds ratio (β-coefficient with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI)) if in the lowest (poorest) versus the highest (best) quintile of physical health quality of life (PCS scores)

Factor in model β-coefficient 95 % CI p-value
Crude model
Caries
ᅟQ1(lowest DMFS) 1.00
ᅟQ2 1.07 0.879 - 1.31 0.490
ᅟQ3 1.18 0.97 - 1.44 0.107
ᅟQ4 1.52 1.25 - 1.85 <0.001
ᅟQ5 (highest DMFS) 1.88 1.54 - 2.31 <0.001
Adjusted modela
Caries
ᅟQ1(lowest DMFS) 1.00
ᅟQ2 1.05 0.83 - 1.33 0.701
ᅟQ3 1.08 0.85 - 1.38 0.520
ᅟQ4 1.26 1.00 - 1.60 0.054
ᅟQ5 (highest DMFS) 1.57 1.23- 2.00 0.001
Education (no university) 1.82 1.53 - 2.17 <0.001
Smoking (present) 1.08 0.87- 1.34 0.478
Sick leave ≥6 months 10.80 9.00 - 12.95 <0.001
≥2 medications 3.61 3.40 - 5.43 <0.001

Ranking into caries quintile groups was for caries prevalence at follow-up by sex and 10-year age groups. Hence, age and sex was not included in the adjusted logistic regression analysis model

aadjustment for marital status, additional lifestyle measures, and medical measures had no further effect (cf. Additional file 2: Table S3)