Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4

Table 3.

Review process

Review Process (N = 494) Title & Abstract Screening Count (%) Full-text Screening Count (%) Data Charting Count (%)
≥2 independent reviewers 167 (34 %) 133 (27 %) 108 (22 %)
1 reviewer & 1 verifier 10 (2 %) 11 (2 %) 43 (9 %)
1 reviewer only 49 (10 %) 32 (6 %) 44 (9 %)
Done but unclear # of reviewers 150 (30 %) 131 (27 %) 186 (38 %)
Not done 2 (0 %) 12 (2 %) 3 (1 %)
Not reported 116 (23 %) 175 (35 %) 110 (22 %)