Table 3.
Percentage of invalid baseline tests and frequency of failures on each validity criteria
ANAM | Axon | ImPACT | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 1,313 | n = 1,355 | n = 1,434 | ||||
% of baselines flagged as invalid |
10.7% | 11.3% | 2.7% | |||
Criteria failed (% of invalid profiles only) |
Consider Retest | Integrity Checks | ||||
SRT acc < 56% | 1.4% | PS acc > 80% | 8.5% | ICC > 30 | 7.7% | |
CDS acc < 56% | 0.7% | AT acc > 80% | 20.9% | WML < 69% | 7.7% | |
PRO acc < 56% | 8.6% | LN acc > 53% | 83.0% | DML < 50% | 46.2% | |
MTH acc < 56% | 23.6% | WM acc > 53% | 14.4% | XO total incorrect > 30 | 7.7% | |
M2S acc < 56% | 35.0% | PS speed < AT speed | 9.2% | TL total correct < 8 | 43.6% | |
CDD acc < 56% | 38.6% | PS speed < WM speed | 4.6% | |||
SR2 acc < 56% | 0.0% | |||||
Questionable Effort | 12.9% | |||||
Total # of above validity criteria failed |
1 | 89.0% | 1 | 79.1% | 1 | 89.7% |
2 | 10.7% | 2 | 8.5% | 2 | 7.7% | |
3 | 2.9% | 3 | 3.9% | 3 | 2.6% | |
4 | 1.4% | 4 | 0.7% | 4+ | 0.0% | |
5+ | 0.0% | 5 | 1.3% | |||
6 | 3.9% |
Note. acc = accuracy; SRT = simple reaction time; CDS = code substitution-learning; PRO = procedural reaction time; MTH = mathematical processing; M2S = matching to sample; CDD = code substitution-delayed; SR2 = simple reaction time 2; PS = processing speed; AT = attention; LN = learning; WM = working memory; ICC = impulse control composite; WML = word memory learning; DML = design memory learning; XO = Xs and Os; TL = three letters