Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;13(6):336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.12.001

Table 1.

Comparison of ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas

Technology Working mechanism Essential components Efficiency Criteria for target site Refs.
ZFN DNA/protein recognition ZFN with zinc finger domain and FokI endonuclease domain Variable Preferential binding sequence for zinc finger proteins or Cys2His2 fingers [2], [3], [4]
TALEN DNA/protein recognition TALE and FokI fusion protein High but variable TALE binding sites should start with a T with the space between two TALEN arms better 15–21 bp [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]
CRISPR/Cas DNA/RNA recognition Cas9 protein and gRNA High but variable gRNA target site should be 20 bp long starting with a G for U6-directed transcription and GG for T7-directed transcription; PAM sequence (NGG) is indispensable for Cas9 nuclease activity [28], [29], [30], [31]

Note: ZFN, zinc finger nuclease; TALEN, transcription activator-like effector nuclease; CRISPR, clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat; Cas, CRISPR-associated; gRNA, guide RNA; PAM, protospacer adjacent motif.