Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):818–828. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9430-4

Table 4.

Comparison of the regression performance of all methods with bi-modality data on 4-JRMI, i.e., AD/MCI-C/MCI-NC/NC

Methods ADAS-Cog
MMSE
CC RMSE CC RMSE
FS 0.491 ± 0.34 5.759 ± 1.05 0.440 ± 0.16 2.366 ± 0.38
PCA 0.510 ± 0.56 5.647 ± 0.97 0.453 ± 0.47 2.390 ± 0.27
CCA 0.522 ± 0.25 5.531 ± 0.91 0.462 ± 0.53 2.334 ± 0.31
SJCR 0.538 ± 0.85 5.639 ± 0.97 0.493 ± 0.33 2.389 ± 0.30
M3T 0.521 ± 0.71 5.452 ± 1.01 0.528 ± 0.32 2.321 ± 0.27
Proposed 0.553 ± 0.34 3.926 ± 0.19 0.567 ± 0.23 1.929 ± 0.13

The boldface denotes the best performance of each column. (CC: Correlation Coefficient; RMSE: Root Mean Squared Error)