Table 4. The SIGN classification of evidence (40).
Levels of evidence | Description |
---|---|
1++ | High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with very low risk of systematic error (bias) |
1+ | Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with low risk of systematic error (bias) |
1− | Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with high risk of systematic error (bias) |
2++ | High-quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies or high-quality case control or cohort studies with very low risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and high probability that the relationship is causal |
2+ | Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with low risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and moderate probability that the relationship is causal |
2− | Case control or cohort studies with high risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and significant risk that the relationship is not causal |
3 | Non-analytical studies, e.g., case reports or case series |
4 | Expert opinion |
RCT, randomized controlled trial