Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 22;113(3):31–38. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0031

Table 4. The SIGN classification of evidence (40).

Levels of evidence Description
1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with very low risk of systematic error (bias)
1+ Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with low risk of systematic error (bias)
1− Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with high risk of systematic error (bias)
2++ High-quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies or high-quality case control or cohort studies with very low risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and high probability that the relationship is causal
2+ Well-conducted case control or cohort studies with low risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and moderate probability that the relationship is causal
2− Case control or cohort studies with high risk of systematic distortion (confounding, bias, chance) and significant risk that the relationship is not causal
3 Non-analytical studies, e.g., case reports or case series
4 Expert opinion

RCT, randomized controlled trial