Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 10;6:17850. doi: 10.1038/srep17850

Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy of MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl for the direct detection of drug resistance in sputum samples using phenotypic culture-based susceptibility testing as a reference standard.

    All sputum samples
Smear-positive sputum
Smear-negative sputum
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
MTBDRplus(v 1.0) RIFR* 97.7 (86/88) 91.8 (34/37) 97.1 (69/71) 91.2 (31/34) 100 (17/17) (p = 0.484) 100 (3/3)
INHR* 95.4 (84/88) 89 (33/37) 95.6 (68/71) 88.2 (30/34) 94.1 (16/17) (p = 0.768) 100 (3/3)
MTBDRsl(v 1.0) OFXR 58.9 (43/73) 100 (38/38) 79.2 (38/48) 100 (34/34) 20 (5/25) (p < 0.001) 100 (4/4)
AMKR 61.6 (45/73) 100 (38/38) 72.9 (35/48) 100 (34/34) 37 (10/27) (p < 0.001) 100 (4/4)

7.4% (9/122) MTBDRplus results from smear-positive samples were indeterminate, compared to 17% (10/59) from smear-negative (p = 0.049).

1.6% (2/122) MTBDRsl results from smear-positive samples were indeterminate, compared to 5.1% (3/59) from smear-negative (p = 0.185). Refer to the materials and methods for a description of what defines an indeterminate result. P-values are for comparisons between smear statuses.

*When the discrepant results were resolved by sequencing the sensitivities and specificities of MTBDRplus were 100% and 100% to detect RIFR, respectively and 97.7% and 97.4% to detect INHR, respectively. RIFR = rifampicin resistance, INHR  = isoniazid resistance, OFXR  = ofloxacin resistance, AMKR  = amikacin resistance.