Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Congenit Heart Dis. 2014 Sep 16;10(4):E146–E154. doi: 10.1111/chd.12226

Table 3.

Correlation between TTE and TEE measurements

Measure r2 Beta 95% CI p
Retro-aortic rim 0.6 0.93 0.82 to 1.1 <0.001
Defect size
Subcostal frontal vs. maximum size on TEE 0.22 0.54 0.38 to 0.70 <0.001
Subcostal sagittal vs. maximum size on TEE 0.28 0.67 0.50 to 0.83 <0.001
Apical 4 chamber vs. maximum size on TEE 0.32 0.58 0.44–0.71 <0.001
Subcostal frontal vs. balloon size on TEE 0.29 0.77 0.57 to 0.96 <0.001
Subcostal sagittal vs. balloon size on TEE 0.26 0.79 0.58 to 1.01 <0.001
Apical 4 chamber vs. balloon size on TEE 0.31 0.70 0.53 to 0.88 <0.001
Septal length
Subcostal frontal vs. maximum length on TEE 0.19 0.31 0.21 to 0.40 <0.001
Subcostal sagittal vs. maximum length on TEE 0.22 0.32 0.22 to 0.42 <0.001
Apical 4 chamber vs. maximum length on TEE 0.28 0.40 0.29 to 0.50 <0.001

Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, TEE tran-esophageal echocardiogram, TTE trans-thoracic echocardiogram

Correlation between TTE and TEE measurements assessed by univariate linear regression.