Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;31(6):414–422. doi: 10.1159/000441689

Table 2.

Overview of studies using TARE in patients with BCLM

Authors, year Number of patients, n Type of microspheresa (mean activityb) Assessment criteriac Complete response, % Partial response, % Stable disease, % Progressive disease, % Median survival, months Mean survival, months
Bangash et al., 2007 [34] 27 glass (2.05 ±1.06 GBq) WHO 39 39 52 8.8 nr nre
Jakobs et al., 2008 [17] 30 resin (1.896 GBq) RECIST 0 61 35 4 11.7 (significantly better for patients with CR or PRd) 9.6
Haug et al., 2012 [35] 58 resin (1.77 ± 0.49 GBq) RECIST 0 25.6 62.8 11.6 6.7 nr
Gordon et al., 2014 [36] 75 glass (1.52 GBq) RECIST 35.3 63.4 1.5 6.6 nr
Saxena et al., 2014 [37] 40 resin (1.67 ± 0.36 GBq) RECIST 5 26 39 29 13.6 nr
a

Glass = Glass microspheres (TheraSphere; BTG International Ltd, London, UK). Resin = Resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres; SIRTex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia).

b

Mean activity infused during TARE. Data are displayed in gigabecquerel (GBq).

c

Assessment criteria of response. WHO = World Health Organization; RECIST = response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

d

CR = Complete response; PR = partial response according to RECIST.

e

nr = Not reported.