Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 26;124(2):235–242. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409423

Table 3.

Effect modification of NO2 impact on fetal growth: INMA study, 2003–2008 (Spain).

Parameter Effect modifier Category n Mean NO2 % diffa (95% CI) p-Valueb pintc
BPD Active smoking Overall 2,276 31.0 –2.9 (–4.3, –1.5) < 0.01
No 1,545 30.5 –1.6 (–3.3, 0.1) 0.06
Yes 731 32.0 –5.8 (–8.2, –3.5) < 0.01 < 0.01
FL Vegetable intake Overall 2,340 30.8 –1.0 (–2.3, 0.3) 0.13
≥ Median 1,170 31.1 –0.3 (–2.1, 1.6) 0.78
< Median 1,170 30.4 –2.0 (–3.9, –0.8) 0.04 0.09
GWG Overall 2,340 30.8 –0.9 (–2.2, 0.4) 0.19
Medium 863 30.1 –1.1 (–5.3, 3.1) 0.60
Low 544 32.1 –1.1 (–3.7, 1.6) 0.43 0.81
High 861 31.0 1.4 (–0.8, 3.6) 0.22 0.01
EFW Active smoking Overall 2,264 31.0 –2.2 (–3.8, –0.6) 0.01
No 1,536 30.4 –1.5 (–3.5, 0.5) 0.14
Yes 728 32.1 –3.9 (–6.6, –1.2) < 0.01 0.03
GWG Overall 2,317 30.8 –2.1 (–3.7, –0.5) 0.01
Medium 876 30.1 –2.7 (–5.3, –0.2) 0.04
Low 563 32.0 –1.9 (–4.8, 0.9) 0.19 0.80
High 878 30.8 –1.4 (–4.2, 1.4) 0.33 0.07
Overall estimates for NO2 at 0–12 weeks on size at week 34, restricted to valid cases for each potential effect modifier: sex, fruit and vegetable intake, type of cooking, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, rurality, weight gain, and season at conception. Effect estimates in each category are combined estimates by meta-analysis of cohort-specific estimates from the stratified analysis. aPercentage of difference in SD scores. bp-Value according to Wald test. cInteraction p-value; results are shown if pint < 0.1. The effect of NO2 on AC was not modified by anyone.