Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Feb 15;43(12):2028–2040. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0101-3

Table 1.

Correlations, means, and standard deviations for study variables for mother–youth and father–youth dyads

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
1. M imitation W2
2. M de-identification W2 −.14
3. F imitation W2 .57 −.12
4. F de-identification W2 −.12 .67 .20
5. M Anglo incongruence W3 .07 −.20 .11 −.19
6. M Mexican incongruence W3 −.11 .05 −.07 −.01 .08
7. F Anglo incongruence W3 −.02 −.23 .17 −.24 .55 .01
8. F Mexican incongruence W3 −.04 −.05 .06 −.03 −.05 .46 .00
9. Adolescents’ gender W1a −.20 −.01 −.02 −.03 .02 −.17 −.02 −.13
10. Mother-youth warmth W1 .46 −.13 .28 −.16 −.01 −.09 −.03 .08 .05
11. Father-youth warmth W1 .28 −.20 .39 −.24 .00 −.11 .06 .07 −.04 .46
12. M. U.S.-raised W1b .00 −.20 .10 −.20 .67 .02 .47 −.04 .03 .05 −.01
13. M immigrant W1 −.12 .03 −.16 .08 −.21 −.10 −.15 −.16 .03 −.05 −.03 −.39
14. M mixed-status W1b .10 .17 .04 .12 −.47 .07 −.32 .17 −.05 .00 .03 −.63 −.47
15. F U.S.-raised W1 .10 −.15 .16 −.20 .62 .04 .52 −.08 .00 .07 .01 .84 −.37 −.49
16. F immigrant W1 −.12 .03 −.16 .08 −.21 −.10 −.15 −.16 .03 −.05 −.03 −.39 1.00 −.47 −.37
17. F mixed-status W1 .00 .12 −.02 .12 −.41 .04 −.36 .21 −.02 −.03 .01 −.46 −.49 .85 −.63 −.49
Mean 3.49 2.80 3.25 2.88 −1.03 0.49 −0.87 0.31 0.50 3.95 3.71 0.35 0.22 0.43 0.32 0.22 0.46
(SD) (0.87) (0.75) (1.02) (0.77) (0.84) (0.63) (0.81) (0.62) (0.50) (0.75) (0.89) (0.48) (0.42) (0.50) (0.47) (0.42) (0.50)

M mother, F father, W1 Wave 1, W2 Wave 2, W3 Wave 3

a

Adolescents’ gender is 1 = male and 0 = female

b

For categorical measures of immigrant status, 1 = reference group and 0 = everyone else (e.g., for U.S.-raised dyads, 1 = U.S.-raised and 0 = everyone else) Correlations with an absolute value at or above .15 are significant at p < .01 and identified within the table in bold