Table 1.
The concentration of CK-MB, CK, LDH, and AST in the blood serum of the each group rats
Groups | CK-MB (U/L) | CK (U/L) | LDH (U/L) | AST (U/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Con | 41.61 ± 3.82 | 327.15 ± 30.24 | 290.27 ± 21.14 | 78.78 ± 8.34 |
Sham | 29.8 ± 2.53 | 259.57 ± 25.36 | 311.43 ± 27.50 | 84.15 ± 8.20 |
MI | 97.50 ± 8.45** | 1852.44 ± 180.50** | 689.16 ± 68.34** | 197.25 ± 14.67** |
MI + BBG | 43.13 ± 6.58 | 261.51 ± 28.33 | 321.41 ± 36.62 | 54.88 ± 5.94 |
MI + SCsi | 85.45 ± 6.35** | 2103.47 ± 213.48** | 723.89 ± 72.58** | 223.63 ± 21.59** |
MI + NONRATT021972si | 32.53 ± 2.76 | 294.18 ± 23.66 | 307.46 ± 30.84 | 57.22 ± 53.75 |
MI + P2X7 si | 35.11 ± 4.21 | 347.43 ± 35.89 | 340.24 ± 35.54 | 74.19 ± 71.01 |
The serum concentration of CK-MB, CK, LDH, and AST in MI group was significantly higher than those in Con group, Sham group, MI + BBG group, MI+ NONRATT021972 si group, or MI + P2X7 si group (p < 0.01). There were no differences among Con, Sham, MI + BBG, MI+ NONRATT021972 si, and MI + P2X7 si groups (p > 0.05). It was the same between MI group and MI + SC si group (p > 0.05). , n = 8
**p < 0.01 compared with Con group