Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;4:e11102. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11102

Table 1.

Cerebellar firing patterns.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11102.016

WT lamb1t normal p,
norm. vs. WT
lamb1t
abnormal
p,
abnorm.
vs. WT
p,
norm vs. abnorm.
Deep cerebellar nuclei neurons
# of cells 26 42 56
average f.r. 37.4 ± 3.7 50.3 ± 5.9 0.3499 26.7 ± 2.9 0.0109 0.0029
predominant f.r. 61.0 ± 6.9 110.1 ± 13.8 0.0004 221.9 ± 20.9 <0.0001 0.0001
CV ISI 0.677 ± 0.05 0.751 ± 0.05 0.6542 1.272 ± 0.07 <0.0001 <0.0001
Purkinje neurons
# of cells 61 76 45
average f.r. 62.9 ± 2.8 73.6 ± 2.8 0.0052 62.7 ± 5.0 0.3400 0.0619
predominant f.r. 83.2 ± 3.4 98.7 ± 3.6 0.0141 103.8 ± 8.1 0.0128 0.4462
CV ISI 0.578 ± 0.02 0.531 ± 0.01 0.3036 0.919 ± 0.07 <0.0001 <0.0001

Means and significance of firing rates and coefficients of variation. Definitions: f.r., firing rate. CV ISI, coefficient of variation of the interspike interval; that is, variability. The data are means ± SEM, and the p values were determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for non-parametric distributions, which can be seen in Figure 8. N = 3 WT and N = 4 lamb1t mice; n for each class of cell recording is given in the table.