Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;53:99–107. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0756-6

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the female population by diabetic and cancer status

Characteristics Cases p-vala1 Controls p-vala1 p-valb2
No DM (N = 835) DM (N = 81) No DM (N = 995) DM (N = 99)
Age 62.0 (8.7) 68.9 (8.0) <0.01 64.1 (9.14) 71.7 (8.4) <0.01 <0.01
Study level
 No studies 168 (20.1) 33 (40.7) 192 (19.3) 41 (41.4)
 <High school 319 (38.2) 27 (33.3) 357 (35.9) 32 (32.3)
 High school 235 (28.1) 15 (18.6) 283 (28.4) 16 (16.2)
 >High school 113 (13.5) 6 (7.4) <0.01 163 (16.4) 10 (10.1) <0.01 0.32
BMI (kg/m2)
 <25 316 (37.8) 14 (17.3) 462 (46.4) 19 (19.2)
 25–30 338 (40.5) 29 (35.8) 339 (34.1) 38 (38.4)
 >30 181 (21.7) 38 (46.9) <0.01 194 (19.5) 42 (42.4) <0.01 <0.01
Age menarche
 <12 years 171 (20.5) 13 (16.1) 213 (21.4) 23 (23.2)
 12–13 years 378 (45.2) 39 (48.1) 445 (44.7) 33 (33.4)
 >13 years 286 (34.3) 29 (35.8) 0.69 337 (33.9) 43 (43.4) 0.09 0.17
Age first birth 27.0 (26.3) 27.0 (4.8) 0.21 26.0 (26.4) 27 (26.4) 0.97 0.75
Family history BC
 No 721 (86.4) 72 (88.9) 905 (91.0) 83 (83.8)
 Yes 114 (13.7) 9 (11.1) 0.52 90 (9.1) 16 (16.2) 0.02 <0.01
Previous biopsies
 No 742 (88.9) 76 (93.8) 979 (98.4) 98 (99.0)
 Yes 93 (11.1) 5 (6.2) 0.17 16 (1.6) 1 (1.0) 0.65 <0.01
Screening behavior (mammogram last 5 years)
 No 91 (8.8) 17 (15.9)
 Yes 949 (91.3) 90 (84.1) 0.02 <0.01
DM characteristics
 Duration 8.73 (7.9) 8.6 (7.1) 0.95
Treatment
 Conservative 14 (17.3) 21 (21.2)
 Drugs 67 (82.7) 78 (78.8) 0.51
Tumor characteristics
Bilateral
 Yes 798 (97.6) 79 (97.5)
 No 20 (2.4) 2 (2.5) 0.99
Histologic subtype
 Ductal 608 (85.0) 64 (87.7)
 Lobular 53 (7.4) 4 (5.5)
 Other 54 (7.6) 5 (6.9) 0.80
*Subtypes
 RH+, HER2− 529 (73.1) 51 (66.2)
 HER2+ 121 (16.7) 9 (11.7)
 Triple− 74 (10.2) 17 (22.1) 0.01

Data are number of participants (percentage) for categorical variables or means (SD) for continuous variables

DM diabetes mellitus

ap-val1: p value from Chi-square or ANOVA test for differences in the distribution of the studied variables by diabetic status; b p-val2: p value from Chi-square or ANOVA test for differences in the distribution of the studied variables by case/control status

* Numbers in tables differ because not all tumors could be classified according to intrinsic subtypes