Table 3.
Experiment 2: average percentage of coverage, amount of systematic viewing, sensitivity, specificity, average total viewing time and average time to first fixation by training followed
| Training | Percentage of coverage | Levenshtein distance | Sensitivity | Specificity | Average Total viewing time (s) | Average time to first fixation (s) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | M (%) | SD | N | M | SD | N | M | SD | N | M | SD | N | M | SD | N | M | SD | |
| Non-systematic viewing | 20 | 59.7 | 9.11 | 20 | .89 | .01 | 24 | .47 | .10 | 24 | .50 | .24 | 24 | 47.2 | 23.02 | 20 | 6.7 | 1.8 |
| Full-coverage viewing | 20 | 66.7 | 7.5 | 20 | .89 | .03 | 25 | .39 | .10 | 25 | .57 | .17 | 25 | 51.4 | 16.4 | 20 | 10.6 | 3.7 |
| Systematic viewing | 24 | 64.6 | 16.42 | 24 | .87 | .03 | 23 | .45 | .11 | 23 | .61 | .13 | 23 | 59.6 | 21.03 | 24 | 12.0 | 5.0 |
The amount of systematic viewing is quantified using the Levenshtein distance; a higher Levenshtein distance indicates less systematic viewing