Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 9;45:440–456. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0403-0

Table 5.

Latent growth model depressive symptom disparities (bisexuals)

Direct effects Model 1 Model 2
B (SE) B (SE)
Intercept
Sexual orientation 0.09 (0.03)** 0.04 (0.03)
Standardized propensity score 0.04 (0.01)*** 0.04 (0.01)***
Being bullied 0.14 (0.03)***
Parental rejection 0.23 (0.05)***
Constant 0.26 (0.01)*** 0.23 (0.01)***
Slope
Sexual orientation 0.03 (0.01)* 0.03 (0.01)**
Standardized propensity score 0.002 (0.004) 0.002 (0.004)
Being bullied −0.04 (0.01)**
Parental rejection −0.02 (0.02)
Constant 0.004 (0.004) 0.014 (0.005)**
Being bullied
Sexual orientation 0.17 (0.05)**
Parental rejection
Sexual orientation 0.08 (0.04)*
Depressive symptoms wave 2
Pubertal development 0.004 (0.007)
Pubertal development × LGB −0.004 (0.017)
Depressive symptoms wave 3
Pubertal development 0.004 (0.004)
Pubertal development × LGB 0.02 (0.01)ǂ
Indirect effects
Sexual orientation → being bullied → intercept 0.02 (0.01)**
Sexual orientation → being bullied → slope −0.006 (0.003)*
Sexual orientation → parental rejection → intercept 0.02 (0.01)*
Sexual orientation → parental rejection → slope −0.002 (0.001)

N = 856; 112 bisexual youth and 744 heterosexual youth

Unstandardized effects. Robust standard errors in parentheses

ǂ p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001