Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2015 Dec;22(12):604–616. doi: 10.1101/lm.038448.115

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2015 Cholé et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 6. — Antennal movement variation as a function of PER generalization to the novel odorant after appetitive conditioning. (A) Proportion of PER recorded to the air control, the CS+, the CS−, and the novel odorant (NOd) in the recording session following training. According to learner bees’ responses to the NOd, two subgroups were made: generalizers and nongeneralizers. (B,C) Histogram showing the change in B angular position (Δθ), and C angular velocity (ΔVθ) during odor presentation (during–before odor) for the air control, the CS+, the CS−, and the novel odorant (NOd) in individuals that extended their proboscis in response to NOd (generalizers, white, N = 23) and the ones that did not (nongeneralizers, black, N = 16). A difference in the angular position response appeared between subgroups only for the NOd (t-test, P < 0.05), not for the CS+, the CS− or the air control. No difference appeared between subgroups for the angular velocity.