Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 28;6:783–792. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.01.032

Table 2.

Candidate models for single-season occupancy for camera trap surveys and fisher detections in the Bass Lake District, Sierra National Forest, California, USA from October 2007 to October 2014.

Model, covariates Ka AIC ΔAIC AICwt Cumulative AICwt
Detection; reviewed by Sweitzer et al.[10]
Occupancy
compete+pred+prey+elev+I(elev2)+ denMDb 12 2197.02 0.00 0.76 0.76
compete+prey+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 11 2199.68 2.66 0.20 0.96
compete+pred+prey+ elev+I(elev2) 11 2203.34 6.32 0.03 0.99
compete+prey+ elev+I(elev2) 10 2205.76 8.74 0.01 1.00
compete+pred+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 11 2213.83 16.82 0.00 1.00
compete+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 10 2214.87 17.86 0.00 1.00
pred+prey+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 11 2215.23 18.21 0.00 1.00
prey+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 10 2216.24 19.22 0.00 1.00
compete+pred+elev+I(elev2) 10 2221.20 24.18 0.00 1.00
compete+elev+I(elev2) 9 2221.93 24.91 0.00 1.00
pred+prey+ elev+I(elev2) 10 2223.36 26.34 0.00 1.00
prey+ elev+I(elev2) 9 2224.15 27.14 0.00 1.00
pred+elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 10 2226.99 29.98 0.00 1.00
elev+I(elev2)+ denMD 9 2227.37 30.36 0.00 1.00
pred+elev+I(elev2) 9 2235.29 38.27 0.00 1.00
elev+I(elev2) 8 2235.49 38.47 0.00 1.00
compete+pred+prey+denMD 10 2319.35 122.33 0.00 1.00
compete+prey+denMD 9 2328.09 131.07 0.00 1.00
compete+pred+prey 9 2334.30 137.28 0.00 1.00
compete+prey 8 2340.81 143.80 0.00 1.00
compete+pred+denMD 9 2345.27 148.25 0.00 1.00
pred+prey+denMD 9 2347.54 150.52 0.00 1.00
compete+denMD 8 2351.19 154.17 0.00 1.00
prey+denMD 8 2353.77 156.75 0.00 1.00
compete+pred 8 2362.75 165.73 0.00 1.00
pred+prey 8 2363.31 166.29 0.00 1.00
compete 7 2365.91 168.89 0.00 1.00
prey 7 2367.54 170.53 0.00 1.00
pred+denMD 8 2367.87 170.86 0.00 1.00
denMD 7 2372.75 175.74 0.00 1.00
pred 7 2385.93 188.91 0.00 1.00
Intercept Only
6
2388.52
191.50
0.00
  1.00
a

Number of parameters.

b

This was the single best model of single-season fisher occupancy from our analyses.