Table 4.
Outcome variable | Concentration index which indicates the extent to which the dental caries index is concentrated by small-area deprivationa | |
---|---|---|
2009/10 | 2013/14 | |
Concentration index (95 % confidence interval), p-value, (n) | Concentration index (95 % confidence interval), p-value, (n) | |
deft | Conc. index: −0.065 (−0.13 to −003), p = .039* | Conc. index: −0.082 (−0.11 to −0.06), p < .001* |
(n = 511) | (n = 2980) | |
deft if deft > 0 | Conc. index: −0.027 (−0.07 to 0.017), p = .23 | Conc. index: −0.041 (−.06 to −02), p < .001* |
(n = 256) | (n = 1678) | |
DMFT | Conc. index: −0.14 (−0.31 to 0.04), p = .13 | Conc. index: −0.031 (−0.12 to 0.055), p = .48 |
(n = 505) | (n = 2939) | |
DMFT if DMFT > 0 | Conc. index: −0.08 (−0.17 to .006), p = .067 | Conc. index: −0.004 (−.042 to 0.034), p = .84 |
(n = 48) | (n = 237) | |
2 or more teeth (permanent or primary) with untreated decay | Conc. index: −0.055 (−0.09 to −0.019), p = .003* | Conc. index: −0.036 (−.048 to −024), p < .001* |
(n = 505) | (n = 2939) |
deft number of decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth, DMFT number of decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth
*Statistically significant at p < .05
aConcentration index is bounded by −1 (all problems concentrated in the lowest SES) and +1 (all problems concentrated in the highest SES). Concentration index of zero = perfect equality. Here, a statistically significant negative concentration index indicates that the dental caries outcome is significantly concentrated amongst those with higher material deprivation