Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;4(6):411–429. doi: 10.2217/cns.15.21

Table 1. . Studies comparing the endoscopic endonasal and microsurgical approaches to pituitary adenoma resection.

Study Study type n Complications (%) Overall remission rate (%) Post-op CSF leak (%)
      E M E M E M
Frank et al. CS 381 – – – – 1.2 –

D'Haens et al. CS 120 11.7 5 63 50 10 1.7

Kabil et al. CS 300 12.4 – 90 – 1.7 –

Starke et al. CS 113 – – 70.8 68.3 2.8 2.4

Razak et al. CS 80 22.5 55 94 57 10 15

Cheng et al. CS 127 25 28.8 71 49.2 4.4 3.4

Cho et al. CS 44 4.5 27 – – – –

Zada et al. CS 100 7* – – – 3 –

†Major surgical complications only.

CS: Case series; E: Endoscopic approach; M Microsurgical approach.

Data taken from [194,207,208,210,215–217,219].