Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 26;38(1):115–121. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv017

Table 2.

Mean scores on the Community Co-Production Scale

Item Part A Part B
1 Have you helped identify what needs to be done and how to do it? 2.57 2.69
2 Have you felt that your views have been taken into account? 2.73 2.73
3 Has local diversity been taken into account appropriately (such as where people live, faith, ethnic background)? 3.00 3.00
4 Have plans about how to go about the project been agreed jointly with you? 2.80 2.92
5 Has the project used existing community networks (such as churches, mosques, play-groups)? 2.80 2.93
6 Has the project provided the structures and resources needed for you to participate? 2.80 2.87
7 Has the project involved people who may have otherwise felt not part of social groups? 2.79 2.93
8 Have London Citizens staff (named) helped to organize the project? 3.00 2.93
9 Have they explained the importance of the project for health? 2.93 2.80
10 Has the project built relationships between local institutions? 2.50 2.64
11 Have you felt more able to make relationships with people in different organizations? 2.73 2.80

Three-point Likert scale: 1 = hardly at all/no; 2 = yes somewhat; 3 = yes a lot; plus additional option: ‘not clear/do not know’ (not scored).