Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 5;3:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2015.02.002

Table 5.

Progression of cardiomyopathy, determined as annualized rate of change in LVMI, in male and female patients stratified by the presence or absence of LVH at baseline.


FOS Evaluable Treated Cardiac cohort
Kampmann et al. (untreated) [8]
Mean annualized LVMI slope (SEM) [95% CI],a g/m2.7/y
Baseline LVH status n n
Males
 Total 71 0.33 (0.10)
[0.13, 0.53]
39 4.07 (1.03)
 LVH 29 0.19 (0.16)
[− 0.13, 0.50]
18 6.59 (8.5)
 No LVH 42 0.47 (0.13)
[0.22, 0.72]
Not availableb
Females
 Total 93 0.48 (0.09)
[0.30, 0.66]
39 2.31 (0.81)
 LVH 45 0.77 (0.14)
[0.49, 1.05]
15 3.77 (7.7)
 No LVH 48 0.19 (0.11)
[− 0.03, 0.41]
Not availableb

CI, confidence interval; FOS, Fabry Outcome Survey; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVMI, left ventricular mass indexed to height; SEM, standard error of the mean.

a

Median (range) follow-up period: FOS, 5.2 (1.5 to 11.4) years; Kampmann et al., 4.5 (1.1 to 9.0) years [8].

b

95% CI for LVMI data were not published by Schiffmann et al. [21].