Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;60(2):806–817. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01922-15

TABLE 1.

Cytotoxicity in human cell lines after 5-day treatment

Base Compound Mean CC50 ± SD (μM) in:
Hepatic cells
Prostate cells (PC-3) Fibroblasts (MRC5) T-cells (MT-4)
Huh7 HepG2 (galactose)
Uridine Sofosbuvir 66 ± 17 >89 >100 >89 >100
Guanosine IDX184 >89 >89 77 ± 14 >89 66 ± 18
BMS-986094 0.5 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 1.0 1.0 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.5
PSI-938 >89 >89 >100 >89 >100
Cytidine PSI-6130 >89 >89 >100 >89 >100
4′-AzidoC >89 >89 30 ± 6 >89 >100
2′CMeC >89 >89 49 ± 18 69 ± 1 19 ± 6
Adenosine GS-6620a 67 ± 13 66 ± 13 40 ± 0.7 8.9 ± 4.1b 7.8 ± 4.3b
ddCc >89 >89 0.80 ± 0.21 >89 >89
Chloramphenicolc >89 >89 16 ± 3 >89 >89
Αlpha-amanitinc 0.45 ± 0.16 0.81 ± 0.35 0.17 ± 0.06 0.34 ± 0.07 0.89 ± 0.10
Puromycinc 0.52 ± 0.19 0.65 ± 0.18 0.22 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.05 0.16 ± 0.06
a

The cytotoxicity of GS-6620 in some cell types was reported previously (13).

b

Complex, multiphasic dose response was observed, with an initial drop in viability of 50% followed by a rebound to over 50% at higher concentrations. Flow cytometry studies suggested that the effect of the compound on these cells was cytostatic instead of cytotoxic.

c

Control treatment.