Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 4;33(4):275–282. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1114348

Table 2.

Differences in C-reactive protein (CRP) estimations between visits to family medicine specialists (GP group) and physicians with other educational status (non-specialist GP group) in primary health care.

Visits to GP group (n = 194) Visits to non-specialist GP group (n = 146) p-values1
CRP crucial for treatment, yes, n (%)2 65 (34) 65 (45) 0.038
Physician’s estimate of CRP (mg/L)3 24 (19) 29 (26) 0.039
Differences between estimated and measured CRP (mg/L)3 −1.4 (29) 2.1 (33) 0.30

Notes:

1

Student’s t-test for comparison of quantitative data and chi-square test for qualitative data.

2

2.6% (n = 9) did not check the “yes” or “no” box on the case report form, four in the GP group, five in the non-specialist GP group.

3

Mean values (standard deviation).