Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 4;33(4):275–282. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1114348

Table 3.

Physician behaviour in light of their opinion on antibiotic prescription issues prior to C-reactive protein (CRP) testing, after viewing the actual CRP level.1

Antibiotics retracted[n (%)] Decision unchanged[n (%)] Antibiotics prescribed[n (%)] p Values2
Visits to GP group (n = 190) 0.22
 CRP crucial for treatment 2 (3.1) 53 (82) 10 (15)
 CRP unnecessary for treatment 2 (1.6) 113 (90) 10 (8.0)
Visits to non-specialist GP group (n = 141) 0.011
 CRP crucial for treatment 9 (14) 48 (74) 8 (12)
 CRP unnecessary for treatment 1 (1.3) 68 (90) 7 (9.2)
Total visits (n = 331)3 0.0018
 CRP crucial for treatment 11 (8.5) 101 (78) 18 (14)
 CRP unnecessary for treatment 3 (1.5) 181 (90) 17 (8.5)
1

“Antibiotics retracted” and “Antibiotics prescribed” means change in approach to prescribing antibiotics.

2

Chi-square test.

3

2.6% (n = 9) did not check the “yes” or “no” box on the case report form, four in the GP group, five in the non-specialist GP group.