Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Aging Res. 2015;41(3):272–302. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1021646

Table 10.

Regression analyses predicting comprehension of implausible 2-negative sentences

Variable Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
Pl 2 neg 0.62 0.14 0.45*** 0.60 0.13 0.43*** 0.59 0.13 0.43*** 0.60 0.14 0.43***
Base 1.65 1.16 0.31 1.21 1.16 0.23 1.44 1.23 0.27 2.07 2.10 0.39
Group 20.95 248.06 0.01 125.7 247.9 0.05 80.37 259.6 0.03 102.6 266.8 0.04
INH 0.18 1.11 0.04 −0.76 1.18 −0.16 −0.87 1.21 −0.18 −1.60 1.81 −0.33
INH × Group 2.11 1.03 0.32* 1.82 1.12 0.28 2.64 2.57 0.40
WM 0.85 1.18 0.15 0.14 1.70 0.02
AS −0.645 1.15 −0.11 0.33 1.62 0.06
WM × Group 1.18 2.47 0.14
AS × Group −2.21 2.49 −0.24
Base × Group −0.38 2.71 −0.06
Constant 2062 167.3 1887 184.6 1926 194.8 1910 203.4
R2(R2 change) .423 (.423) .456 (.033) .46 (.004) .469 (.009)
Adjusted R2 .39 .417 .404 .386
F for R2 change 12.83 (p < .001) 4.2 (p = .044) 0.26 (p = .77) 0.34 (p = .79)

Note. Pl 2 neg = plausible 2-negative condition. Base = baseline task; WM = working memory task; AS = attention switching task; INH = inhibition task.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.