Table 4.

Language comprehension efficiency performance: Post hoc comparisons for the Negatives × Plausibility interaction (minF′ analysis)

Comparison	minF′ (df)	p valuea
Pl 1 neg vs. Pl 0 neg	0.902 (1, 38)	1
Pl 2 neg vs. Pl 0 neg	6.23 (1, 55)	.14
Pl 2 neg vs. Pl 1 neg	2.25 (1, 69)	1
Imp 1 neg vs. Imp 0 neg	0.292 (1, 25)	1
Imp 2 neg vs. Imp 0 neg	21.253 (1, 55)	<.001
Imp 2 neg vs. Imp 1 neg	15.563 (1, 64)	.002
Imp 0 neg vs. Pl 0 neg	0.305 (1, 23)	1
Imp 1 neg vs. Pl 1 neg	0.001 (1, 17)	1
Imp 2 neg vs. Pl 2 neg	9.28 (1, 41)	.037

Note. Pl = plausible condition; Imp = implausible condition; 0 neg = 0-negative condition; 1 neg = 1-negative condition; 2 neg = 2-negative condition.

^ap values are Bonferroni adjusted.