Table 9.
Executive functions performance (reaction time): Post hoc comparisons for the Task × Group interaction
Comparison | t(df) | p valuea | db |
---|---|---|---|
YA Base vs. YA WM | −2.59 (39) | .16 | 0.39 |
YA Base vs. YA AS | −2.86 (39) | .08 | 0.45 |
YA INH vs. YA Base | 7.32 (39) | <.001 | 1.69 |
YA AS vs. YA WM | 0.28 (39) | 1 | 0.11 |
YA INH vs. YA WM | 4.73 (39) | <.001 | 0.66 |
YA INH vs. YA AS | 4.46 (39) | <.001 | 0.63 |
OA Base vs. OA WM | −2 (38) | .752 | 0.27 |
OA Base vs. OA AS | −1.89 (38) | .96 | 0.21 |
OA INH vs. OA Base | 10.4 (38) | <.001 | 1.88 |
OA AS vs. OA WM | −0.11 (38) | 1 | 0.05 |
OA INH vs. OA WM | 8.35 (38) | <.001 | 0.8 |
OA INH vs. OA AS | 8.46 (38) | <.001 | 1.07 |
OA Base vs. YA Base | 5.56 (77) | <.001 | 0.72 |
OA WM vs. YA WM | 5.01 (77) | <.001 | 0.86 |
OA AS vs. YA AS | 4.62 (77) | <.001 | 0.78 |
OA INH vs. YA INH | 8.71 (77) | <.001 | 0.96 |
Note. YA = younger adults; OA = older adults; Base = baseline task; WM = working memory task; AS = attention switching task; INH = inhibition task.
p values are Bonferroni adjusted.
Cohen’s d effect size.