Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 11.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Aging Res. 2015;41(3):272–302. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.1021646

Table 9.

Executive functions performance (reaction time): Post hoc comparisons for the Task × Group interaction

Comparison t(df) p valuea db
YA Base vs. YA WM −2.59 (39) .16 0.39
YA Base vs. YA AS −2.86 (39) .08 0.45
YA INH vs. YA Base 7.32 (39) <.001 1.69
YA AS vs. YA WM 0.28 (39) 1 0.11
YA INH vs. YA WM 4.73 (39) <.001 0.66
YA INH vs. YA AS 4.46 (39) <.001 0.63
OA Base vs. OA WM −2 (38) .752 0.27
OA Base vs. OA AS −1.89 (38) .96 0.21
OA INH vs. OA Base 10.4 (38) <.001 1.88
OA AS vs. OA WM −0.11 (38) 1 0.05
OA INH vs. OA WM 8.35 (38) <.001 0.8
OA INH vs. OA AS 8.46 (38) <.001 1.07
OA Base vs. YA Base 5.56 (77) <.001 0.72
OA WM vs. YA WM 5.01 (77) <.001 0.86
OA AS vs. YA AS 4.62 (77) <.001 0.78
OA INH vs. YA INH 8.71 (77) <.001 0.96

Note. YA = younger adults; OA = older adults; Base = baseline task; WM = working memory task; AS = attention switching task; INH = inhibition task.

a

p values are Bonferroni adjusted.

b

Cohen’s d effect size.