Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):957–965. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1834-0

Table 1.

Subject characteristics before and after IMM or RYGB

IMM RYGB
Month 0 Month 12 aP Month 0 Month 12 aP bP
Male/Female (n) 8/7 - 6/9 - 0.46
Age (y) 48.5 ± 2.1 - 46.9 ± 2.2 - 0.59
DM duration (y) 8.1 ± 1.7 - 11.2 ± 1.7 - 0.21
Weight (kg) 104.4 ± 3.9 92.8 ± 4.6 0.0001 105.0 ± 3.3 74.6 ± 3.3 <.0001 <.0001
BMI (kg/m2) 35.5 ± 0.9 31.5 ± 1.1 0.0002 36.2 ± 0.7 25.7 ± 0.9 <.0001 <.0001
Total weight loss (%) - 11.4 ± 2.3 - 28.9 ± 2.2 <.0001
HbA1C (%) 9.1 ± 0.2 6.1 ± 0.1 <.0001 9.7 ± 0.2 6.4 ± 0.3 <0.0001 0.49
DM meds (n/subject) 4.6 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 0.3 1 4.1 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.5 0.07 0.11
HOMA-IR (mmol × mU × L−2) 13.0 ± 2.5 7.0 ± 1.7 0.08 14.1 ± 3.6 2.1 ± 0.9 0.002 0.18
Matsuda Index (1/(mmol/L)2*(pmol/L)2) 1.9 ± 0.3 5.7 ± 1.7 0.03 3.6 ± 1.0 11.1 ± 1.6 0.0003 0.10

Values represent mean ± SEM.

a

P within group change;

b

P difference in the change over time between groups; any significant differences (P<0.05) between groups at the same time-point are indicated in bold.