Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 23;32:501–511. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0793-9

Table 1.

Average, median, and SD of the Euclidean distance between landmark coordinates for the algorithm accuracy and interobserver variation

Measurement error (mm) Algorithm versus observer I Algorithm versus observer II Interobserver variation
Mean ± SD Median Mean ± SD Median Mean ± SD Median
Right coronary ostium 2.37 ± 1.44 2.22 2.02 ± 1.34 1.65 2.38 ± 1.56 2.01
Left coronary ostium 1.99 ± 1.30 1.88 3.25 ± 4.57 1.95 3.21 ± 4.89 1.61
Right coronary hinge point 3.03 ± 1.48 2.52 3.45 ± 1.89 2.95 2.24 ± 1.26 1.95
Non coronary hinge point 2.84 ± 1.93 2.44 2.86 ± 1.57 2.56 2.96 ± 1.53 2.58
Left coronary hinge point 3.06 ± 1.72 2.84 3.21 ± 1.50 3.36 2.53 ± 1.22 2.28
Overall error 2.66 ± 1.63 2.35 2.96 ± 2.52 2.46 2.67 ± 2.52 2.23
Stenotic patients 2.66 ± 1.60 2.31 3.02 ± 2.68 2.62 2.69 ± 2.73 2.25
Non-stenotic patients 2.66 ± 1.73 2.35 2.76 ± 1.97 2.26 2.60 ± 1.77 2.23
End diastole image volumes 2.57 ± 1.58 2.23 2.75 ± 1.82 2.42 2.48 ± 1.62 2.14
End systole image volumes 2.94 ± 1.76 2.60 3.65 ± 4.05 2.62 3.32 ± 4.35 2.51

The overall Error and different subsets (e.g. stenotic, non-stenotic, end diastolic analysis, and end systole analysis) of the dataset are shown