Table 2. Statistical analyses of relationship between movement indices and subjective value during monetary decisions.
| Predictor | Now Choices |
Future Choices |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | SE | t | p (χ2) | b | SE | t | p (χ2) | |
| (Intercept) | 0.2278 | 0.0066 | 34.5902 | 0.0000 | 0.7743 | 0.0073 | 105.8247 | 0.0000 |
| Demographics | −0.0250 | 0.0131 | −1.9057 | 0.0567 | −0.0218 | 0.0142 | −1.5348 | 0.1248 |
| Delay (log) | −0.0440 | 0.0019 | −23.7257 | 0.0000 | −0.0294 | 0.0021 | −13.7683 | 0.0000 |
| Response Time (log) | 0.0218 | 0.0038 | 5.7398 | 0.0000 | −0.0013 | 0.0045 | −0.2947 | 0.7682 |
| Wide Trajectory | 0.0233 | 0.0073 | 3.1743 | 0.0015 | −0.0207 | 0.0091 | −2.2795 | 0.0226 |
| X Flips | −0.0066 | 0.0036 | −1.8322 | 0.0669 | −0.0043 | 0.0044 | −0.9896 | 0.3224 |
To create the outcome variable, equivalence points were converted to proportion of the subjective value of €16 Now. Linear mixed models were employed with participant as random variable. Delay and Response Time were log transformed. In addition, to facilitate model fit, z scores of log Response Time and X Flips were used.