Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 5;82(4):1060–1068. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03280-15

TABLE 2.

Characterization of the 1st-step enrofloxacin-resistant clones selected in vitro

Isolate (ST) Resistant coloniesa
QRDR mutation at indicated positionb
Genotype MIC (μg/ml)c
ENR concn (μg/ml) Recovery frequency (no. of clones) Mutation distribution (no. of clones with mutation/total no. of clones) GyrA
GyrB
ParC
81 83 87 362 80 84 98 ENR DAN MAR
PG45 (ST1) Gly Ser Glu Asp Ser Asp Thr WT 0.25 0.25 0.5
0.25 2E−05 (20) 11/20 GT1 0.25 1 0.5
0.25 5/20 Gly NA NA NA
0.25 3/20 Asn NA NA NA
0.25 1/20 Asn Arg NA NA NA
15762 (ST2) Gly Ser Glu Asn Ser Asp Thr WT 0.25 0.5 1
0.25 3E−06 (20) 20/20 GT4 0.25 0.5 1
15488 (ST2) Gly Ser Glu Asn Ile Asp Thr WT 0.5 1 2
2 6E−07 (5) 3/5 Phe 16 16 >64
2 1/5 Tyr NA NA NA
2 1/5 Gly NA NA NA
15875 (ST2) Gly Ser Glu Asn Ser Tyr Thr WT 1 1 2
2 4E−07 (4) 3/4 Lys 4 8 8
2 1/4 Phe 4 8 8
15527 (ST3) Gly Ser Glu Asn Ser Asp Thr WT 0.5 0.5 2
0.5 7E−05 (12) 1/12 NA NA NA
0.5 6/12 Val NA NA NA
0.5 1/12 Val Gly NA NA NA
0.5 2/12 Phe NA NA NA
0.5 1/12 Phe Asn GT2 4 4 8
0.5 1/12 Phe Asn Arg GT3 4 2 8
8619 (ST3) Gly Ser Glu Asn Ser Asp Thr WT 0.25 0.5 0.5
0.25 2E−06 (10) 8/10 NA NA NA
0.25 2/10 Phe GT5 1 2 1
a

Resistant colonies were selected on plates containing enrofloxacin at the indicated concentrations. The recovery frequency was determined as the number of colonies appearing on the plate in the presence of enrofloxacin divided by the number of colonies contained in the inoculum.

b

Point mutations detected in QRDRs of gyrA, parC, and gyrB are presented as the corresponding amino acid substitutions in individual clones. For each isolate, the WT phenotype is shown first. The GT1, GT2, GT3, and GT4 genotypes were used to perform further selection steps. When the phenotype of an isolate differs from that of PG45T, the mutation is indicated in bold. Newly acquired mutations are underlined.

c

MIC of an ENR-resistant mutant representing the genotype. NA, not applicable (mutant not available in broth culture).